Atlas VPN and NordVPN Merger

On April 24, 2024, a significant change occurred in the VPN landscape as Atlas VPN merged with NordVPN.

This transition involves Atlas VPN announcing the discontinuation of its services, directing current users to migrate to NordVPN, which is recognized for its reliability and is part of the same parent organization.

For further details regarding the closure of Atlas VPN, you can visit their official announcement here:

https://atlasvpn.com/blog/announcement

Additionally, you can check out our comprehensive review of NordVPN. If you seek alternatives to these services, feel free to browse our recommended VPN articles.

Both Hola and Atlas VPN provide users with free and premium VPN options. They excel in bypassing geographical restrictions on various streaming platforms. However, the differences between these two VPN services are more pronounced than their similarities.

Atlas VPN is relatively new to the market and features a modest but expanding server network. In contrast, Hola operates by utilizing servers while also leveraging the internet connections of its free user base.

This article will delve into an in-depth comparison of their respective features, advantages, performance metrics, privacy protocols, security measures, customer service, and pricing structures for both free and paid plans. This analysis aims to guide you in deciding which VPN service may suit your needs better.

Since its inception in 2019, Atlas VPN has become a notable player in the VPN market.

In 2021, it was acquired by Nord Security, the company behind the well-known NordVPN.

This acquisition aligns with Nord Security's strategy, as they have also recently brought Surfshark into their portfolio.

Despite this consolidation, each VPN continues to operate independently, catering to distinct market segments.

Atlas VPN primarily appeals to users seeking cost-effective solutions, while NordVPN positions itself as a high-end service, and Surfshark is seen as a more affordable premium alternative.

On the other hand, Hola VPN distinguishes itself with a unique peer-to-peer (P2P) sharing model.

Users can utilize Hola’s free service by sharing their internet connection with others.

Those who subscribe to Hola’s paid plans gain access to a network of devices owned by fellow users, enhancing their connectivity options.

Hola provides users with a free option alongside two premium plans known as “premium” and “ultra.” In contrast, Atlas VPN offers a free plan specifically for Windows 10 and 11 users, in addition to a cost-effective paid plan.

When it comes to Hola’s paid subscriptions, users are not required to share their internet connections with others, which results in improved speeds, a broader range of servers, and enhanced streaming quality. However, numerous sources suggest that the free version of Hola does not utilize data encryption. While Hola claims to implement encryption, users of the free plan face drawbacks, such as shared connections, a lack of privacy, and potential security vulnerabilities.

On the other hand, Atlas VPN’s paid users enjoy a variety of advantages absent in the free version. These benefits include access to a wider selection of servers (the free plan only has three), streaming-optimized servers, faster speeds, an unlimited data allowance (5 GB monthly on the free plan), round-the-clock customer support, and additional security features. Although the free plan of Atlas VPN has its limitations, the primary drawback is the frequent upselling, some of which is unavoidable.

In terms of affordability, Atlas VPN is significantly less expensive compared to Hola. To access Hola’s lowest-priced plan, a three-year commitment is necessary, while Atlas VPN offers a comparable rate for approximately a third less per month with just a two-year subscription. For one-year plans, Hola’s premium offering is more than double the price of Atlas VPN’s plan, and the ultra plan from Hola is six times pricier than Atlas VPN’s equivalent.

While Hola occasionally runs promotional deals that might offer better rates, Atlas VPN remains one of the most budget-friendly VPN options available, whereas Hola is positioned among the pricier alternatives.

Both Hola and Atlas VPN are compatible with the four leading operating systems.

However, Atlas VPN also provides a dedicated app for Linux, while neither service offers a Chrome extension.

Hola stands out with its extensive compatibility with various entertainment devices, whereas Atlas VPN has recently expanded its device support.

It's important to note that Atlas VPN's free version is exclusive to Windows 10 and 11 users.

Hola's free plan restricts usage to a single device, but their premium and ultra plans allow connections on 10 to 20 devices simultaneously.

In contrast, Atlas VPN boasts unlimited simultaneous connections, even for users on its free plan.

While many VPNs typically permit around five connections, both Hola and Atlas VPN are competitive in this aspect.

Since neither provider offers router applications, the extra connections can be seen as a workaround, as all devices linked to a router count as just one connection.

A distinctive feature of Hola is its proprietary Chromium-based browser, which could be advantageous for users.

However, it's worth mentioning that Hola tracks user activity, meaning it doesn't provide the same level of privacy as browsers like Brave or Vivaldi.

Although it claims to be more secure than Chrome or Edge by not displaying ads and refraining from selling personal data, user tracking remains a concern.

On the other hand, Atlas VPN emphasizes privacy with its tracker blocker, preventing third-party sites such as Facebook and Google from monitoring user online activities.

Additionally, it offers protection against harmful websites and ads.

Another key feature is split-tunneling, which allows users to bypass the VPN for specified activities such as online banking that require a real IP address for verification.

While Hola includes this feature across all its applications, Atlas VPN currently supports it only within its Android app.

When comparing Hola and Atlas VPN, both services have unique strengths that cater to different streaming needs.

Hola excels in providing access to streaming content through its peer-to-peer (P2P) network, allowing users to bypass geo-restrictions effectively. By connecting through others' personal internet connections, Hola can help users access blocked video content.

On the other hand, Atlas VPN proves to be a versatile option, working seamlessly with every service tested. It offers dedicated servers for streaming, enhancing the overall experience for users who are looking for reliable connections.

For optimal streaming quality, subscribing to Hola's Ultra plan is essential, as it enables 4K streaming— the highest resolution available. Similarly, Atlas VPN's paid plan also supports 4K streaming, making it a strong competitor in this regard.

Hola's free plan restricts users to standard definition (SD), which typically ranges from 480i to 480p. Its premium plan offers high-definition (HD) streaming, generally at 720p. However, given the advancements in technology, HD is increasingly viewed as lower quality compared to newer resolutions in 2022.

The device used for viewing plays a significant role in determining the streaming resolution. Most modern TVs and computer monitors display at 1080p, while higher resolution options like 2K and 4K are becoming more common. Premium smartphones also feature displays that support 2K or 4K resolutions, making them suitable for high-quality streaming.

Although neither Hola nor Atlas VPN made it to our top seven best streaming VPNs list, Atlas VPN stands out as a strong potential contender worth considering for users seeking reliable streaming solutions.

Hola is not functional in China.
On the other hand, Atlas VPN has potential in China, but it may require some trial and error to find a successful configuration.
However, our latest tests revealed that it was not operational.
For those residing in China or in regions where ISPs restrict VPN usage, we recommend reviewing the outcomes of our comprehensive VPN testing.

While Atlas VPN lacks automated setup wizards, the installation process is straightforward and user-friendly.

You shouldn't feel daunted by it; setting it up is similar to installing any other software.

In just a few simple steps, you can have everything up and running quickly.

Both VPN applications feature a streamlined design.

This simplicity enhances user experience, particularly for beginners.

However, more experienced users might seek additional features and greater customization options.

Sixty years ago, Canadian country artist Hank Snow released the hit song “I’ve Been Everywhere,” which highlighted various cities across the globe.

In a surprising twist, Hola claims to have an expansive presence, boasting servers in 212 locations, although these aren’t specifically tied to cities. Among its locations is Turkmenistan, which is known for having the slowest internet speed worldwide, averaging just 0.5 Mbps. In stark contrast, Liechtenstein offers the fastest average speed at an impressive 211.26 Mbps—over 400 times quicker.

Hola likely has users scattered across these 212 locations, allowing subscribers to leverage their internet connections. The assertion that Hola operates more than twice the number of locations compared to leading VPNs is indeed remarkable. However, many of these claimed locations could simply be virtual servers. This implies that while a server may seem to be in a certain area, it may actually reside elsewhere, using a different IP address.

Despite potential exaggeration, Hola appears to have a more extensive network for both its free and paid plans compared to Atlas VPN. Atlas VPN’s free plan limits access to servers in only three cities: Amsterdam, Los Angeles, and New York. Due to high user traffic, these servers might experience slow performance. Similarly, when connecting to Hola’s servers, if you unwittingly choose a virtual server, your connection speed could be unpredictable, as it depends on the actual performance of another Hola user’s connection.

To access the full range of Hola’s servers, one must subscribe to their ultra plan. Notably, Atlas VPN does not utilize virtual servers in its offerings.

Atlas VPN is currently focused on establishing its business with attractive introductory rates, planning to expand its server availability as it scales. In the meantime, it’s amusing to note that the network named “Atlas” doesn’t quite have a worldwide reach.When comparing Hola and Atlas VPN, the speed performance of each service presents an interesting picture.

Hola operates differently than traditional VPNs as it allows connections to both Hola servers and various devices owned by Hola users. This decentralized approach can lead to variable speeds, especially if you're trying to connect to a device located in a specific country. Internet Service Provider (ISP) speeds also play a significant role, with many offering budget plans that feature slower speeds compared to their premium counterparts.

In our testing, Hola showcased a range of average speeds that were generally satisfactory. Their plans categorize speeds as follows: the free plan offers “basic” speed, the premium plan provides “fast” speeds, while the ultra plan boasts “ultra-fast” speeds. This tiered system suggests that the premium and ultra plans are optimized for better performance, potentially resulting in slower experiences for free plan users due to server congestion.

In contrast, Atlas VPN delivered impressive speed results across multiple continents. Our tests indicated an average download speed of 247 Mbps, situating it among the top performers in the VPN market. Atlas VPN maintains a consistent speed, although users should note that the free plan may not provide the same level of performance.

While Hola can achieve high speeds, especially with some experimentation in connection choices, users may want to avoid overly congested networks, such as those in Turkmenistan. It’s important to recognize that Hola’s premium plan may not match the speed of Atlas VPN’s premium offering.

However, for those considering free plans, Hola tends to outperform Atlas VPN. Hola’s free service supports a wider array of connections, allowing for faster experiences compared to the limited access provided by Atlas VPN’s free plan, which only offers three servers. Although speed will still be lower than a direct connection without a VPN, Hola's setup allows for a more favorable user experience.

When comparing VPN services, security features play a crucial role.

Atlas VPN stands out with its comprehensive security offerings.

The inclusion of the WireGuard protocol significantly boosts both speed and overall security, providing users with a robust experience.

Additionally, Atlas VPN provides a private DNS, and our tests confirmed that there were no DNS leaks.

In contrast, Hola VPN is less transparent about its security measures.

While it does offer encryption and kill switches, the full extent of its security protocols remains unclear.

Kill switches serve an essential function by disconnecting your internet if the VPN connection drops, thereby preventing accidental exposure of your data.

Atlas VPN includes unique features to enhance user anonymity.

For example, the SafeSwap feature allows the use of multiple IP addresses simultaneously, although it's confined to select server locations.

Moreover, the Multihop+ feature enables users to rotate their virtual locations, adding extra layers of encryption, applicable only in North America and Europe.

However, it’s important to note that these advanced features are not accessible to free plan users, although all essential security features remain available.

On the other hand, Hola's free plan introduces significant security concerns.

By allowing users to share their internet connection, Hola inadvertently creates vulnerabilities that hackers could exploit, potentially turning your device into part of a botnet.

Moreover, experienced third parties could track your online activities.

If you utilize cloud services from companies like Google or Microsoft, these entities, along with Hola and other unknown third parties, may monitor your web activity concurrently.

Using Hola means that anyone sharing your connection is utilizing your IP address.

Depending on the regulations in your area and the policies of your Internet Service Provider (ISP), your online activities could be under surveillance.

This situation poses a risk; if one of your Hola peers partakes in illegal activities, you might be held accountable.

While the chance of these security issues arising with Hola's free plan is low, they are genuine risks that users should consider before opting for this service.

Hola, an Israeli-based VPN service, operates without the fear of government pressure to disclose user information. However, it does gather extensive personal data about its users, even going as far as collecting information from social media platforms you frequent. Regardless of the subscription plan, Hola monitors your online activities, and upgrading from the free version doesn't enhance your privacy.

While Hola doesn't market itself as a privacy-focused service, it assures users that it won't sell their data. Nevertheless, it actively tracks your internet use to ensure compliance with legal standards. This level of oversight might raise concerns for many adults, but some parents might view it as a safeguard for their teenagers.

On the other hand, Atlas VPN, which is currently owned by Nord Security and operates out of Panama, maintains its headquarters in the United States. This positioning means that Atlas VPN is subject to potential government information requests. However, it claims not to track or log user activities. Despite this, its privacy policy does raise some questions, as it collects various data for marketing and analytics, some of which could potentially identify users.

There are VPNs that either collect no data or only aggregate information for internal use. For those seeking total privacy, alternatives exist. That said, the data collection practices of Atlas VPN are relatively minimal and unlikely to compromise user safety. Its no-logs policy has yet to undergo an independent audit, but it does feature a warrant canary on its website, indicating it has never provided user information to authorities.

Atlas VPN also accepts cryptocurrency payments, enabling users to maintain anonymity by utilizing a disposable email and crypto transactions.

Neither Hola nor Atlas VPN bombard their free plan subscribers with advertisements. However, both free versions come with limitations, including slow service, designed to encourage users to consider upgrading to paid tiers.

VPN Comparison: Hola vs Atlas VPN

Hola offers a unique approach to VPN connectivity, allowing users to connect either to servers or directly to other users' internet connections. When using a server, you are assigned a shared IP address. Conversely, connecting to a peer means you adopt the IP address of that individual’s computer. This can be particularly advantageous when trying to access websites that restrict VPN traffic, like many streaming platforms, as it provides a level of anonymity.

In contrast, Atlas VPN consistently assigns a shared IP address when connecting to its servers. Its features, such as Safeswap and Multihop+, enhance user privacy by making it more challenging to trace back to your actual IP address.

While shared servers can bolster anonymity, they can also lead to performance issues, especially for free VPN users. A crowded server can result in slower webpage loading times and an increased frequency of captchas. This is especially prevalent on Atlas VPN's free plan, which limits access to just three servers. Hola's free plan also faces similar challenges; however, its peer-to-peer connections may offer a workaround, as users can access another individual's internet connection. In Hola's apps, users select countries rather than specific connection points, which may require some experimentation to secure a fast link. Sometimes, less conventional routes can yield better speeds than the standard “information superhighway.”

For most users, a static IP address isn’t a necessity, but it may be beneficial for those needing to receive incoming connections or accessing services that restrict based on IP addresses, though such cases are rare.

A NAT firewall can effectively manage unsolicited traffic between your devices and the internet, commonly integrated into Wi-Fi routers, and some VPNs may utilize them as well. However, neither Hola nor Atlas VPN explicitly mentions this feature. On the other hand, Atlas VPN does provide some degree of protection against malware and harmful websites, which can serve as a valuable compensatory measure.

Hola provides a unified platform for tech support, customer inquiries, and refund requests. Our experience showed that they typically respond to questions within the same or next day, which is quite adequate for general inquiries.

On the other hand, Atlas VPN users tend to share positive feedback regarding their support on Trustpilot. However, during our attempt to reach out, it took eight hours to get an email response, and some of our questions went unanswered. While reports vary, it's generally noted that Atlas VPN has around 27 employees, with 26 listed on LinkedIn, none of whom hold roles directly related to customer service. This suggests that Atlas VPN might outsource its support.

When it comes to user reviews, both Hola and Atlas VPN have garnered impressive ratings on Trustpilot, each achieving a 4.5 out of 5 score, categorized as “excellent.” At the time of writing, Atlas VPN had 176 reviews, which is relatively limited compared to Hola’s extensive collection of about 1,200 reviews.

It’s essential to consider that the ratings on platforms like Trustpilot, Google Play Store, and the App Store may be skewed for freemium VPNs. Users of free services are less likely to report issues, particularly billing-related ones, as they do not experience the same level of commitment as paying customers.

While 72% of Atlas VPN users rate their service as excellent, 17% express dissatisfaction. One recurring issue noted is the difficulty in obtaining refunds, a challenge we encountered as well during our evaluation. In comparison, other VPNs like CyberGhost, PrivateVPN, Hotspot Shield, and IPVanish maintain high satisfaction levels, with only 2-3% of their customers rating them poorly.

As Atlas VPN continues to grow, addressing customer service and support will be crucial for enhancing user experience and satisfaction.Navigating Hola's website can be quite the challenge due to its sparse content. However, it does provide useful setup guides complete with screenshots, which can be a lifesaver. Unfortunately, there is no search function on the homepage, and the support link is not easily accessible, hidden at the bottom of the page. Users often find that the search tool is ineffective, frequently failing to yield relevant answers. The knowledge base only addresses 79 frequently asked questions.

In contrast, Atlas VPN features a well-structured website available in four different languages. Similar to Hola, it lacks a search bar on its homepage, and its help center is also not prominently displayed. Nevertheless, Atlas VPN’s search tool is quite effective, organizing answers into categories, which can streamline the user experience. The website includes several tutorials with screenshots, and the installation guides are equipped with tables of contents for easier navigation. While prompt email responses from Atlas VPN may be lacking, users can generally find the information they need on the site.

Although Atlas VPN could improve its responsiveness, it offers a plethora of features at a budget-friendly price. Its commercial plan is significantly more affordable than any of Hola's options. Utilizing the WireGuard protocol gives Atlas VPN a notable edge in speed and security that Hola cannot match. While Hola can provide fast service, Atlas VPN consistently delivers superior speed and enhanced security features. Notably, Atlas VPN adheres to a no-logs policy, whereas Hola retains user data and tracks personal information across all their plans.

Both VPNs are effective for streaming; however, only subscribers of Hola’s ultra plan can access the highest streaming resolutions.

Hola does have certain advantages, such as a greater number of servers and wider geographical coverage, although this can depend on the specific plan. Currently, Atlas VPN lacks servers in significant areas worldwide. If users are located outside North America or Europe, they might struggle to find a nearby server for a satisfactory connection. This is not a concern with Hola, as users can connect to a peer.

In terms of customer support, Hola appears to have the upper hand. Atlas VPN needs to improve its email response times and simplify the refund process for customers. With its competitive pricing, robust security, speed, and ability to unblock content, Atlas VPN has the potential to compete with top-tier VPNs if it focuses on responsible growth and enhancing customer service.When evaluating Hola and Atlas VPN, especially focusing on their free offerings, some key similarities and differences emerge.

Hola often outperforms Atlas VPN in terms of speed due to its unique peer-to-peer connection model, which allows access to a broader range of servers. However, both free versions fall short in providing adequate support for streaming services. It's important to note that Hola prohibits torrenting and has notable security vulnerabilities, whereas Atlas VPN’s free service offers a more secure experience.

Atlas VPN also prioritizes user privacy—extending its privacy policies to its free plan—while Hola does not protect user data, exposing you to potential risks. If speed is your only priority and you are willing to compromise on security and privacy, Hola might be the choice for you.

Here’s a detailed comparison across several critical categories:

• Server Networks: Hola boasts an extensive list of server locations, but many are virtual. In contrast, Atlas VPN has a smaller network predominantly based in Europe and North America. A larger server network typically allows for better content access and faster connections, with Hola utilizing both peer connections and traditional servers.

  
  

• Speed: Using a VPN can generally reduce internet speed. Atlas VPN ranks among the faster options available, but Hola presents unique challenges that make speed testing less straightforward. We conduct tests across various continents to assess performance accurately.

  
  

• Unblocking Capabilities: Many users rely on VPNs to circumvent geo-restrictions. We evaluate both services against popular streaming platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, BBC iPlayer, and Disney+ to see how effectively they can bypass these barriers. Additionally, we assess their ability to overcome censorship imposed by various governments.

  
  

• Security Features: Key aspects of security include encryption methods, connection protocols, and the presence of kill switches. We also consider protection against data leaks and unique offerings, such as Hola's web browser and Atlas VPN's features like SafeSwap and Multihop+.

  
  

• Privacy Practices: We analyze logging policies, data collection practices, legal obligations in the VPN's home country, options for anonymous registration, and the company's history concerning user privacy.

  
  

• User Experience: Both Hola and Atlas VPN provide applications across major operating systems. The development of user-friendly software requires significant investment in time and resources. We examine customer support quality, website usability, and responsiveness to ensure a satisfactory user experience.

  
  

In conclusion, while both Hola and Atlas VPN have their strengths and weaknesses, the choice ultimately depends on whether you prioritize speed over security and privacy.When evaluating VPN services, the concept of value goes beyond just pricing. It encompasses what you receive in return for your expenditure. Both Hola and Atlas VPN offer free services, but they, too, come with associated costs. Analyzing VPN pricing can be tricky, as companies often employ strategies that complicate direct comparisons.

Our approach involves scrutinizing money-back guarantees to assess their reliability. We also investigate upselling practices and any questionable business conduct. Additionally, we highlight unique features that may not be standard across other VPN providers.

For those interested in the detailed methodologies behind our VPN assessments, information is available on our full testing processes.

Hola has a policy of collecting a range of personal information, including your IP address, name, email, and payment details. Their privacy statement indicates, "we will keep records containing client personal data," while also assuring users that they do not sell or rent personal data. However, users must be aware that safeguarding their privacy is primarily their own responsibility. Hola's data logging practices aim to deter illegal activities, protecting users from being implicated in wrongdoing that may occur through their internet connections. They state their commitment to reporting any misuse to authorities.

Conversely, Atlas VPN adopts a different approach by not logging personal information. Their privacy policy mentions the use of a randomly generated identifier and a signed token tied to your device, which could be interpreted as personal data. Occasionally, they might require email verification to prevent abuse, operating within the framework of their terms of service. This method is known as fingerprinting, allowing Atlas VPN to recognize users even without storing identifiable personal details.

Using shared connections does carry inherent risks, such as exposure to hacking. However, this model also presents advantages by reducing costs for Hola's free service tier, offering users access to a wide range of IP addresses. Moreover, if you possess an IP address that permits access, you might not require a VPN for content unblocking.In 2018, Hola's Chrome extension was compromised, specifically affecting users involved in cryptocurrency. Although the issue was promptly addressed by Hola, it raised concerns about browser extensions in general. Many VPNs provide these extensions, but they can pose security risks and potentially slow down browsing speeds. In fact, in August, Google had to eliminate five extensions from its Chrome web store after researchers discovered they were tracking users' browsing habits and paying affiliates for purchases made through specific e-commerce sites.

On the other hand, Atlas VPN supports torrenting across both its free and paid plans, a feature not available with Hola.

When it comes to security, Atlas VPN takes the lead. Sharing internet connections can introduce various risks, but Atlas VPN offers advanced features like SafeSwap and Multihop+, which enhance user anonymity. Hola does not implement obfuscated servers, which could further protect user privacy.

Hola does have an edge with its applications available for gaming consoles like Xbox and PlayStation, which can be a significant benefit for gamers.

In terms of user base, Hola claims over 252 million members, while Atlas VPN has accumulated more than six million users. Being a newer and smaller service, Atlas VPN has its own set of advantages and challenges. However, neither provider discloses the specific number of users subscribed to their free versus paid plans.

What is a Netflix VPN and How to Get One

A Netflix VPN is a virtual private network specifically designed to help users access region-restricted content on Netflix by connecting to servers in various countries. By using a Netflix VPN, individuals can bypass geographical limitations and enjoy a broader range of shows and movies. To set up a Netflix VPN, users need to select a reliable VPN provider that supports streaming, install the VPN application, and connect to a server in their desired region before logging into Netflix.

Why Choose SafeShell as Your Netflix VPN?

If you want to access region-restricted content using a Netflix VPN, you may want to consider the SafeShell VPN . SafeShell VPN is designed to overcome the common issue of a netflix vpn not working due to outdated software. It stands out with its high-speed servers optimized for seamless Netflix streaming, ensuring that you can enjoy your favorite shows and movies without interruptions. These servers provide lightning-fast connection speeds, offering buffer-free playback and high-definition streaming. Additionally, SafeShell VPN allows you to connect multiple devices at once, supporting a wide array of operating systems like Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and more, so you can enjoy your content on any device you prefer.

Moreover, SafeShell VPN features an exclusive App Mode that lets you unlock and enjoy content from multiple regions simultaneously, giving you access to a vast range of streaming services and libraries. This feature provides you the freedom to explore a world of entertainment without restrictions. With SafeShell VPN's lightning-fast speeds, you can say goodbye to buffering and throttling, experiencing internet performance like never before. Furthermore, your online privacy is safeguarded with top-level security through the proprietary ShellGuard VPN protocol, which ensures advanced encryption and robust security features to protect your data from prying eyes.

A Step-by-Step Guide to Watch Netflix with SafeShell VPN

To begin using SafeShell Netflix VPN , the first step is to subscribe to the service. Start by visiting the SafeShell VPN website and selecting a plan that aligns with your needs and budget. After selecting your plan, click on the "Subscribe Now" button to complete the process. Once subscribed, proceed to download and install SafeShell VPN by heading back to the website. Here, you will choose the version of the app or software compatible with your device, whether it is Windows, macOS, iOS, or Android, and then download it accordingly.

Next, launch the installed SafeShell VPN app and log into your account. SafeShell supports two operational modes, but for an optimal Netflix streaming experience, it is advisable to select the APP mode. Once in APP mode, browse through the list of available VPN servers and select one located in the region whose Netflix library you wish to access, such as the US, UK, or Canada. Click "Connect" to establish a secure connection to your chosen server. Finally, open the Netflix app or visit the Netflix website, log in with your account details, and start enjoying the diverse content available in the region you connected to through SafeShell Netflix VPN.